|
|
|
|
When we
found the derivative of a function like:
|
|
|
|
|
|
F(X) = (3X2
- 2X + 5)5
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
had an outside function ( stuff ) 5 |
|
|
and an inside function
3X 2 - 2X + 5 to deal with. |
|
|
We
wind up with: |
|
|
F'(X) =
5(3X2 - 2X + 5)4(6X - 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
If
we substituted the letter "u" for the inside part, we
would have had: |
|
|
|
|
|
F(x)
= u5
|
|
|
And
the derivative of u 5 is: |
|
|
F'(x)
= 5u4 du
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
du part was created when we found the derivative. |
|
|
Since
"u" stood for some complicated thing, |
|
|
the derivative of u
(du) is probably not equal to 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
When
we do an integral it's
like we were given a derivative, |
|
|
and we have to find the function
that it came from. |
|
|
|
|
|
If
we are finding the integral of something |
|
|
that looks like an
outside/inside type function, |
|
|
we
have to arrange it so the derivative of the inside part (the du) |
|
|
is
sitting next to the outside part. |
|
|
That
is, the ( ) n part. |
|
|
|
|
|
If
we were asked to find the integral of something like: |
|
|
|
|
|
(3X - 4)5
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
first thing we do is say: |
|
|
"WOW! That looks like one of those
outside/inside type things. |
|
|
We
need a "u," and we need a "du." |
|
|
It
looks like 3X - 4 should be the "u." |
|
|
That
makes the expression: |
|
|
u5
|
|
|
|
|
|
And
here we hit the snag. |
|
|
We've
got no du lying around. |
|
|
|
|
|
Since
we said that 3X - 4 was our "u," then du should be the
derivative of this. |
|
|
That
would be 3dX. |
|
|
|
|
|
dX
is equal to 1, so that's not a problem. But we don't have a 3 handy. |
|
|
Where
do we get one? |
|
|
|
|
|
The
rules say that you can only multiply something by 1 and not change
the value. |
|
|
So
here our fancy name for 1 is going to be 1/3 x 3 x dX. |
|
|
|
|
|
Writing
the expression as a function so that we can work with it, |
|
|
and
multiplying by this fancy 1: |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
So
we got the three we wanted, but we also had to take a 1/3 that we
didn't want. |
|
|
What
do we do with the 1/3? |
|
|
We
put it in a place where it won't be in the way. |
|
|
Like
to the left of the integral sign. |
|
|

|
|
|
So
now we've got what we needed. |
|
|
We
have the u (3X - 4), |
|
|
and
we have the du (3dX). |
|
|
We
have: |
|
|

|
|
|
Working
out the integral, we get: |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Now
we put back the (3X - 4) in place of the u ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
and
simplify. |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
The
du or dX or dWhatever, is created when we find the derivative. |
|
|
So
it is used up, destroyed, absorbed, or whatever when we find the
integral. |
|
|
In
any case, it goes away. |
|
|
And
as usual, don't forget the "+ C" part! |
|
|
|
|
|
We
can't always find a du lying around the equation. |
|
|
We
can change constants around, like we did in the last example. |
|
|
But
if we need an X or even an extra power of X, we're stopped. |
|
|
For
now anyway, but stay tuned ... |
|
|
|
|
|
So
if we have: |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
The
u part can be X 4 - 3X 2 + 2, so the du part
needs to be 4X 3 - 6X. |
|
|
We
don't have this term in the equation, |
|
|
and
we can't get it without changing the value of the equation. |
|
|
So
we can't do this one with the tricks we have so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
Here
are some we can solve now. |
|
|
These
examples will take some studying. |
|
|
You may not get all or any of them
right off. |
|
|
Remember
that we can live with extra constants in the problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
So
here we tried the obvious first, the 3X. |
|
|
That
made du equal to 3dx. |
|
|
We
only had dx, but we can deal with differences in multiplied
constants. |
|
|
Since
3X probably needs to be u here, what else is there? |
|
|
3dX
has to be du. |
|
|
It's
the first step to really mastering these |
|
|
to see that you multiply du
= 3dX by 1/3 |
|
|
to
keep du equal to 3dX and turn the 3dX into what you need |
|
|
to
substitute into the equation. |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
tricky part here was realizing that p
is just a number, |
|
|
so
it can be moved to the left and dealt with later. |
|
|
From
there we have the same "fix the coefficient on the du" |
|
|
like the last example. |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Another
fix the constants on the du deal. |
|
|
The
equation was just nastier. |
|
|
This
fix the constants on the du looks like a common thing, eh? |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
This
is a very tricky one, so watch closely! |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Most
people start this one OK. That is, they set u = X-1. |
|
|
The
problem is that when they stop there, |
|
|
they
notice that they are going to have an extra X in the problem. |
|
|
The
trick is to do the second step on the right. |
|
|
That
gives you SOMETHING to substitute for that first X. |
|
|
Then
just multiply everything out and do the integral term by term. |
|
|
|
|
|
These
problems are really like big puzzles. |
|
|
The
only way to get good at them is to do a bunch of them |
|
|
and
learn as many tricks to move the numbers around as you can. |
|
|
|
|
|
copyright 2005 Bruce Kirkpatrick |
|