|
|
|
|
Suppose
we have a circle with a radius of ...
|
|
|
maybe
40 inches. |
|
|
How
would we do it? |
|
|
|
|
|
We
would use the equation for the area of a circle, of course! |
|
|
|
|
|
A
= p
r2
|
|
|
|
|
|
So
we would have: |
|
|
A
= p
(40)2
|
|
|
A
= 1600p
|
|
|
A
= 5026.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
But
what if we wanted to find the area of a ring one inch wide |
|
|
with
an inside radius of 40 inches? |
|
|

|
|
|
We
could find the area of a circle with a radius of 41 inches |
|
|
and
subtract from that the area of a circle with radius of 40 inches ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
= p
(40 + 1)2 - p
(40)2 |
|
|
|
A
= 1681p
- 1600p |
|
|
|
A
= 81p |
|
|
|
|
|
That
works fine, and we get the right answer. |
|
|
But
when the equations get messy, this method might get tough. |
|
|
|
|
|
There
is a way to use calculus to approximate the area of a ring, or a
shell, |
|
|
or a tube
or
anything for which we have the equation for the basic shape. |
|
|
|
|
|
Think
of the area of the ring as the change (or difference) in the area of
a circle |
|
|
from
one with a radius of 40 inches to one with a radius of 41 inches. |
|
|
That
is, DA. |
|
|
And
the difference in the radius (41 - 40) as Dr. |
|
|
|
|
|
If
Dr
is very small compared to r, |
|
|
derivatives
give us a good approximation of the area of the ring. |
|
|
|
|
|
Take
the derivative of the area equation |
|
|
A
= p
r2
|
|
|
as
the radius changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did
you see that we didn't need to use implicit differentiation |
|
|
on the
right side of the equation since
the "with respect to" variable was r. |
|
|
|
|
|
We
can multiply both sides of this equation by dr, to get: |
|
|
|
|
|
dA
= 2p
r dr
|
|
|
|
|
|
That
last little move didn't look like much, |
|
|
but
it will come in VERY HANDY in later topics. |
|
|
|
|
|
This
equation translates in English to: |
|
|
"The
change in area is equal to two times pi times the original radius |
|
|
times the change in the radius" |
|
|
|
|
|
Plugging
the numbers we have into this equation, we have: |
|
|
|
|
|
dA
= 2p(40)(1)
|
|
|
dA
= 80p
|
|
|
|
|
|
That
was pretty close to the actual answer A
= 81p
but took less effort. |
|
|
This
method will work with any shape, |
|
|
but
the thickness of the ring or shell needs to be small |
|
|
compared
to the radius itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
Use
the approximation method to find the volume of material |
|
|
that
goes into making a ball 0.1 inches thick that has an inside radius
of 5 inches. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
equation for the volume of a sphere is: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
derivative of the volume as the radius changes is: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
can multiply both sides of the equation by dr |
|
|
that
gives us: |
|
|
dV
= 4p
r2 dr
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substituting
in the values: |
|
|
r =
5 and dr = 0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
That
gives us: |
|
|
dV
= 4p(5)2
(0.1)
|
|
|
dV
= 10p
cubic inches
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
is the approximate volume of the material the ball is made of. |
|
|
It
is not the volume inside the ball. |
|
|
The
volume inside the ball is much greater. |
|
|
|
|
|
Things
like dA, or dr or dY are called differentials, |
|
|
and
any equation that contains one or more of these |
|
|
can be called a
differential equation. |
|
|
(Impressive
name, eh?) |
|
|
|
|
|
If
we have any equation that looks like: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
can multiply both sides by dX and get: |
|
|
|
|
|
dY = (Some
Stuff)dX |
|
|
|
|
|
If
X is an independent variable, then dX = 1 so this is no big deal |
|
|
BUT,
if dY and dX both stand for some complex stuff, |
|
|
the process is very
important. |
|
|
|
|
|
"Differential
Equations" is supposed to be some big nasty scary topic. |
|
|
You've
already solved some and didn't even know it! |
|
|
It
can't be all that bad then, can it? |
|
|
|
|
|
copyright 2005 Bruce Kirkpatrick |
|