|
|
|
|
By now, you have seen
equations like these:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y = X2
- 3X + 5
|
|
|
and |
|
|
F(X)
= X2 - 3X + 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between these
two is just picky details. |
|
|
Just think of
them as the same. |
|
|
In these pages, we will often
talk about F(X) or
G(X)
or something like it. |
|
|
This is just a
way of saying: "some equation where X is the variable." |
|
|
Like the X 2 - 3X +
5 stuff we just had. |
|
|
|
|
|
If we talk about F(t) or
G(t),
that just means we are talking about some stuff |
|
|
where the variable
name is t. |
|
|
Like maybe: |
|
|
|
|
|
F(t)
= 16t3 - 4t2 + 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
When we solve a
function for some X (or t) value, it's usually no big deal. |
|
|
We just put the
number into the equation in place of the variable |
|
|
and work out the
arithmetic. |
|
|
|
|
|
If we wanted to
solve the function above for t = 2, we just put in 2 for t. |
|
|
|
|
|
F(t)
= 16t3 - 4t2 + 2 |
|
|
F(t)
= 16(2)3 - 4(2)2 + 2 |
|
|
F(t)
= 16 x 8 - 4 x 4 + 2 |
|
|
F(t)
= 128 - 16 + 2 |
|
|
F(t)
= 114 |
|
|
|
|
|
No biggie, eh? |
|
|
|
|
|
What if we have
this: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, we can
use algebra to simplify it: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F(x) = X2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe you
remember this function from algebra as a parabola. |
|
|
The graph of
the function looks like this: |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
BUT, we have a
problem. |
|
|
Our original
function had a denominator, X. |
|
|
When the
denominator equals ZERO, |
|
|
the function will not work out to some nice
value: |
|
|
|
|
|
Putting 0 in
for X in our original function, we get: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And THAT puppy
is undefined. |
|
|
|
|
|
We can't deal
with a zero in the denominator... |
|
|
YET! |
|
|
If we
graphed the original function, we get: |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
| X |
- 1 |
- 0.7 |
- 0.3 |
- 0.2 |
- 0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1 |
| F(X) |
1.00 |
0.49 |
0.09 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
undef |
0.01 |
0.04 |
0.09 |
0.49 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to now, if a
denominator on one side of a function was zero, |
|
|
we just said that
the function was undefined. |
|
|
|
|
|
WAIT A MINUTE! |
|
|
Are we saying
that there is a way to get around that zero in the denominator |
|
|
and
find an answer? |
|
|
YUP! |
|
|
|
|
|
Differential
Calculus could also be called: |
|
|
"How to
get an answer when you have a zero in the denominator" |
|
|
|
|
|
Here's how it
works. |
|
|
If you try to
solve an equation for a value of X that makes the denominator zero, |
|
|
you get nowhere fast. |
|
|
|
|
But... |
|
|
You CAN solve
the equation for values of X |
|
|
a tiny bit bigger or smaller than the
problem value. |
|
|
|
|
|
We want to see
what happens to the value of the function |
|
|
as we get really, really,
close to the value of X |
|
|
that gives us the denominator zero. |
|
|
Sometimes, the
value of the function gets closer and closer to some number. |
|
|
|
|
|
That's what
happened in our example. |
|
|
As X got closer
and closer to the problem value, |
|
|
the function got closer and closer
to a value. |
|
|
It just so
happened in this case, |
|
|
that both the problem X value and the
function value |
|
|
we got closer and closer to were the same number.
Zero. |
|
|
|
|
|
It usually
doesn't happen that both numbers are the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
Here's the big
leap to calculus... |
|
|
We say: |
|
|
If the closer
we get to some undefined X value, |
|
|
the closer the function value gets
to some number. |
|
|
And the
function value we get closer to is the same |
|
|
if the close X value is
bigger or smaller than the undefined X value. |
|
|
|
|
|
WE JUST GO
AHEAD AND SAY THAT NUMBER |
|
|
IS THE VALUE OF THE FUNCTION AT THE X
VALUE |
|
|
THAT MAKES THE FUNCTION UNDEFINED. |
|
|
|
|
|
That's
Calculus! |
|
|
|
|
|
It's basically
saying: |
|
|
Yeah I KNOW
that the function is undefined at that X value, |
|
|
but if it wasn't
what would the value be. |
|
|
|
|
|
It's an amazing
thing. |
|
|
If you said
something like that in Algebra, |
|
|
the teacher would have probably
smacked you around. |
|
|
With words,
anyway. |
|
|
But it's the
guts of Calculus. |
|
|
|
|
|
Math types have
invented all kinds of fancy symbols and terms |
|
|
to try to hide behind. |
|
|
But that's the
deal. |
|
|
|
|
|
Differential
Calculus is division where the denominator is zero |
|
|
and we use the
little "What would the answer have been" scam |
|
|
to get the
answers. |
|
|
|
|
|
The same scam
makes Integral Calculus work too, but we get to that later. |
|
|
|
|
|
The scam has an
official math name. |
|
|
It's called
Finding the Limit. |
|
|
|
|
|
They say: |
|
|
We are finding
the limit as X approaches |
|
|
(the value that makes the function
undefined). |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
Find out what
the function value is when X = 2 if it wasn't undefined for ... |
|
|
Oh wait, we're
in calculus now |
|
|
OK, Find the
limit of F(X) as x approaches 2 for the following function: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| x |
1.80 |
1.90 |
1.95 |
1.99 |
2 |
2.01 |
2.05 |
2.10 |
2.20 |
| F(x) |
3.24 |
3.61 |
3.80 |
3.96 |
undef |
4.04 |
4.20 |
4.41 |
4.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
So when X
equals 2 we have big problems. |
|
|
The denominator
equals zero and the function is undefined. |
|
|
But it sure
looks like the closer X gets to 2, the closer the function gets to 4 |
|
|
Two things are
really important here. |
|
|
One is that the
function value gets closer and closer to 4 |
|
|
if X is bigger than 2 or
if X is smaller than 2. |
|
|
The other is
that the value the function is getting closer to |
|
|
is an actual
number, not infinity. |
|
|
|
|
|
If those two
things are true, |
|
|
same function value with X values bigger and
smaller than the problem value. |
|
|
And the
function value we are closing in on is a number, not infinity. |
|
|
|
|
|
We get to use
the scam and say that is the Limit of the function |
|
|
as X approaches
the problem value. |
|
|
And treat that
function value as if it were the answer we would actually calculate. |
|
|
If one or the
other of the two things are not true, |
|
|
math types say the limit does
not exits. |
|
|
That means
we're stopped again. |
|
|
At least for
now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Of course math
types invented notation for this. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you wanted
to find the limit of something as X approached 2, you would write: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in front of the
thing. |
|
|
Lim is the
abbreviation for Limit |
|
|
WOW We saved
two whole letters! |
|
|
|
|
|
So for the
example we did, |
|
|
we would take the limit of both sides as X
approached 2. |
|
|
We would write: |
|
|
| Lim |
F(X)
= |
Lim |
X2(X-2) |
|
| X
®
2 |
X
®
2 |
(X-2) |
|
|
|
Now just
simplify: |
|
|
| Lim |
F(X)
= |
Lim |
X2 |
| X
®
2 |
X ®
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
And if the zero
problem is gone from the denominator, |
|
|
substitute in the limit value
for X and solve. |
|
|
|
|
|
F(2) = 22 |
|
|
F(2) = 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Here's the
graph of the whole thing: |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
If we can't
factor away the terms that will make the denominator equal to zero, |
|
|
we're stopped. |
|
|
The limit does
not exist. |
|
|
If we can
factor those terms away, |
|
|
the next step is to put the "Lim"
notation up next to the function. |
|
|
Lim is very
powerful. |
|
|
You can use it
with any type of math function there is. |
|
|
Yes it slices,
it dices, it makes mounds and mounds of julienne fries |
|
|
and it's not
available in any stores. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lim is also
kind of blind. |
|
|
It doesn't
notice anything in a function except the variable |
|
|
named right below
the Lim. |
|
|
If we had the
expression: |
|
|
|
|
|
3X + 2Y + 5Z |
|
|
|
|
|
and we wanted
to find the limit as Z approached 3: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Lim will
ignore the X and the Y and go right for the Z. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It substitutes
the number below it for Z |
|
|
|
|
|
3X + 2Y +
5 x 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
and simplifies
the expression as much as possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
3X + 2Y +
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
copyright 2005 Bruce
Kirkpatrick |
|