|
|
|
|
So how do
you factor something |
|
|
if you
don't have a perfect square or cube? |
|
|
|
|
|
How would
we find the factors? |
|
|
|
|
|
Would we
take a guess? |
|
|
|
|
|
Yep!
That's one way to do it ... |
|
|
|
|
|
Let's say
we have the expression: |
|
|
|
|
|
X3
+ 4X2 + X - 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does this
factor? |
|
|
|
|
|
Who
knows! |
|
|
|
|
|
Let's
guess that (X - 1) might be a factor. |
|
|
|
|
|
Swell,
how can you tell for sure? |
|
|
|
|
|
Well, how
would you check to see if 3 was a factor of 114? |
|
|
You would
divide 114 by 3 and see if it came out evenly. |
|
|
That is,
see if it divides with no remainder. |
|
|
If it
does, then 3 is a factor of 114. |
|
|
Let's see
... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Great 114
= 3 x 38. |
|
|
How does
that help us? |
|
|
|
|
|
We can
use the same procedure to see if |
|
|
X - 1 is
a factor of X 3 + 4X
2 + X - 6. |
|
|
We just
divide the expression by X - 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
SAY
WHAT??? |
|
|
|
|
|
It looks
a little goofy, but trust me, it works. |
|
|
|
|
|
First set
up the problem ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
The
highest power of X in the whole expression is X
3. |
|
|
The
highest power of X in the thing we're dividing by is X. |
|
|
X
3
divided by X is X 2. |
|
|
That
means, if this thing is going to work, |
|
|
the first
term we get from the division will be X
2. |
|
|
Write it
in ... |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
See that
we line it up over the 4X
2, |
|
|
because
it's the same power of X. |
|
|
|
|
|
Now we
multiply the term on top (the X
2) |
|
|
by the
thing we're dividing by (the X-1) |
|
|
write the
product under the expression |
|
|
and
subtract it from the expression. |
|
|
This is
exactly what we do in any division problem. |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
So what's
left starts with 5X 2. |
|
|
If (X -
1) divides into this expression, |
|
|
it will
go 5X times, since the X from the (X - 1) |
|
|
times 5X
equals 5X 2. |
|
|
THIS IS
THE HEART OF THIS WHOLE |
|
|
EQUATION
DIVISION THING |
|
|
Before
you're done with this page, you need to understand |
|
|
why the
next term we write on top is 5X. |
|
|
If you
do, the rest is details. |
|
|
If you
don't, you don't know this concept. |
|
|
|
|
|
Here's
the next step ... |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, this
looks like it might work. |
|
|
What's
left starts with 6X. |
|
|
If (X -
1) is going to divide into this, it will go 6 times |
|
|
since 6 x
X = 6X. |
|
|
Let's see
what we're left with. |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Since we
have a remainder of zero, |
|
|
we know
that (X - 1) times (X 2 + 5X + 6) equals X
3 +
4X 2 + X - 6. |
|
|
|
|
|
(X - 1) (X2
+ 5X + 6) = X3 + 4X2 + X - 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
and if we
look close, we might even see that |
|
|
(X 2
+ 5X + 6) factors to (X + 3)(X + 2). |
|
|
That
means we can say ... |
|
|
|
|
|
(X - 1) (X + 3)
(X + 2) = X3 + 4X2 + X - 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
So swell,
fine, wonderful, this actually works. |
|
|
But it
has one big problem. |
|
|
We had to
guess the factor correctly to make this work. |
|
|
If we had
guessed, say, (X + 1) which is NOT a factor, |
|
|
the
division would not have come out evenly. |
|
|
We would
have to keep on guessing at factors |
|
|
until we
got lucky and guessed one right. |
|
|
|
|
|
TRUE! |
|
|
|
|
|
The thing
is, that before computers came along |
|
|
this was
about the only way we had short of calculus |
|
|
to find
these factors. |
|
|
|
|
|
Now a
fancy calculator can check loads of factor guesses per second. |
|
|
Unfortunately,
you still need to learn this method. |
|
|
|
|
|
Why? |
|
|
Well,
partly because lots of the time |
|
|
you
aren't looking for all of the factors of some big expression |
|
|
you just
want to know if some special thing is a factor |
|
|
and
that's easy to check. |
|
|
Just
divide and see if the remainder is zero. |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
|
|
|
Is 2X + 3
a factor of 10X 5 + 9X
4 - X
3 + 14X
2
- 17X - 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Another
way to ask this is: Does 2X + 3 divide evenly into |
|
|
10X
5
+ 9X 4 - X
3 + 14X
2 - 17X - 12
(without a remainder)? |
|
|
|
|
|
Let's see
... |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
2X + 3
can't be divided evenly into 18, so we're stopped. |
|
|
This one
didn't work out evenly. |
|
|
We have a
remainder of 18. |
|
|
That
means 2X + 3 is not a factor. |
|
|
|
|
|
If we
want to get really technical, |
|
|
we could
use this remainder (18) |
|
|
and the
thing that we were dividing by (2X + 3) |
|
|
to create
a funny last term of our division |
|
|
and have
it work out evenly. |
|
|
We could
call the last term: |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Then when
we multiply this by (2X + 3) we would get the 18 |
|
|
that
would make things work out evenly. |
|
|
|
|
|
That
would give is: |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
While
this little trick let us finish the problem, |
|
|
most of
the time we only want to call things factors |
|
|
if they
work out cleanly without the tricky fraction term at the end. |
|
|
|
|
|
copyright 2005 Bruce Kirkpatrick |
|