|
|
|
|
Now we
actually get to use this factoring for something! |
|
|
|
|
|
If we
have something like ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Can we
make this easier to deal with? |
|
|
That is,
can we make the fraction look simpler? |
|
|
As it
sits, no we can't. |
|
|
But if we
factor it ... |
|
|
|
|
|
Let's
see: |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
We can
write this as: |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
When we
have a fraction where all the things are multiplied |
|
|
like
factors, we can split up these factors into different fractions. |
|
|
Using a's
and b's, we might say ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
When we
have stuff like this, |
|
|
the
factors don't care how they are split ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's see
what damage we can do to our problem |
|
|
with this
trick ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now look
at those puppies we split apart. |
|
|
One has
the same term in the numerator and denominator. |
|
|
That
means it is equal to 1. |
|
|
So we can
say ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplying
something times 1 doesn't change the value |
|
|
so we
don't even need to write it in if we don't want to. |
|
|
What we
do in real life when we have the same thing |
|
|
on the
top and the bottom of a fraction is to cancel. |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Remember
that to do this, |
|
|
everything
in the numerator and denominator |
|
|
must be
multiplied together. |
|
|
|
|
|
If we
have: |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
We can
not do any canceling because of that 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
Let's see
another one: |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Factoring
this we get ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Then
canceling ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
OK. How
about this one ... |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
The
numerator is not a perfect square, |
|
|
but it
can be factored. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
denominator is the difference of 2 squares: |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
|
|
|
What
would we do with something like ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
What we
do is this ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Now
before you start multiplying these things out |
|
|
try to
factor then all to see if there are any factors |
|
|
that you
can cancel. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you
work with it for a while, |
|
|
you will
find that all 4 of these terms will factor. |
|
|
Eventually
you get: |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Now since
everything is multiplied by everything else |
|
|
on the
top and on the bottom, |
|
|
we can
cancel any time we find the same term |
|
|
on the
top and on the bottom. |
|
|
|
|
|
Is there
anything to cancel? |
|
|
Yup. |
|
|
In fact,
everything cancels! |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, if
EVERYTHING CANCELS, what's left? |
|
|
|
|
|
Remember
that before, when we started this canceling business, |
|
|
we said
that we were going to get rid of things |
|
|
that were
equal to one. |
|
|
What we
actually did here is: |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
So as
weird as it looks ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
|
|
|
|
|
What
would you do with this one? |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
There is
all kinds of fancy math hocus pocus to prove it, |
|
|
but the
deal is this ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
So you
flip the thing you were dividing by |
|
|
and then
multiply ... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Now let's
solve it! |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
So we get
... |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Can we
factor this any farther? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sure. |
|
|
We could
factor the (X - 3) as the difference of two squares. |
|
|
It would
be weird, but we know how. |
|
|
We could
factor the (X + 2) as the sum of two cubes. |
|
|
That's
even more weird. |
|
|
The
question is, why would we do it? |
|
|
We can't
cancel anything else |
|
|
so
there's no reason to do any more factoring. |
|
|
|
|
|
Should we
multiply it out? |
|
|
|
|
|
If you
have a reason to, sure. |
|
|
If not,
why bother. |
|
|
|
|
|
I can't
think of a reason to, can you? |
|
|
|
|
|
copyright 2005 Bruce Kirkpatrick |
|